Focus on / Continue to Clean up Swat4.

[Woner]

My 2 cents on this Community so far is "fairly Positive".

I do think the Cod (new one out every 14 months) and BF sections will be impossible to grow as theirs just way too many gametypes, game modes, scrim mods, Ladders, Leagues to have any "Commonality" and should be scrapped, most of us are here to Clean up Swat4.

I would still like to see an Active Player Database made, there is STILL players on this Forum Crashing Servers, Hacking and even a couple of nights ago someone boasting on their "own" server how they just Smurfed in on HBS for a few rounds.

Lastly, there is also a few Clans who are subsequently represented by Non-Swat4 Players (under 100 hours of S4 play). I am certainly NOT comfortable with them Voting on Suspicious Vids when they are not 'yet' competent Players of the game. I'd like to see a 500 Hour of S4 play Minimum to be in on the Voting and truly to actually take part in any issues on this Forum.

My thoughts.

[Matt]

Hello Woner,

Sorry for the delay in reply.

As FPA founder, I admire your forward thinking and suggestions.

Firstly, thank you for the feedback, it goes along way in making this community better for all.

SOG has an active reporting database found below which is enforced by our adminbot. I believe other clans here such as MYT also have a similar setup.

www.clanreportdb.co.uk (http://www.clanreportdb.co.uk)

Following on from this, our public reporting database will be also released later this year for clans to utilise and keep a comprehensive list of players within causing havoc on servers. In addition, the FPA database will also be released to hold all the reports made at this website for easy reference. Plans are also for the SOG adminbot to reference that database also, and we hope other adminbot clans will do the same.

Lastly, in response to your idea about the hours of gameplay before allowing membership or voting, I believe this is a route we may have to take as the FPA is getting very popular with as you say, some novice reporters and members within the group. Something for the future perhaps.

Thanks for your feedback once more, and for your input at this community.

Matt

[Disturbed]

Also you might want to promote using Boonbuster, instead of UAC or UAC 2 (atleast give it a try). This is however an anti-hack community so I don't know why new anti-hack programs aren't being tested or tried out.

Thanks,
Disturbed

[BHC_audio]

Well we just expanded into the Swat 4 Community. We are currently using MarkMods V11beta with anti cheat's. This setup seems to be working very well for us. I am going to have one of our Swat 4 members come and register here so we can also represent Swat4 and Cod 4. I know alot of people complained about lag using markmods and i do have to agree back in v3 - 6 there was alot of lag. Maybe that is worth checking out.